ZED 2 vs ZED 2i 10m cable option for underwater ROV — latency concerns

Hello everyone,

I am working on an underwater robotics project using the ZED 2 camera. We are planning to deploy the camera in a waterproof housing mounted on an ROV, and we need a cable length of approximately 10 meters to reach the topside computer.

We are currently weighing two options and would appreciate any insights from the community:

Option 1: Keep our existing ZED 2 camera and use a third-party USB 3.0 active optical (or active copper) extension cable to extend the reach to 10m.

Option 2: Purchase a new ZED 2i with the 10m cable option.

Main concern: latency and bandwidth at 10m

We have heard that standard USB 3.0 connections can introduce noticeable latency beyond 3m. We need real-time performance for visual servoing and relative pose estimation, so latency is critical for us.

Specific questions:

  1. Is the 10m cable option for the ZED 2i an active optical cable, or an active copper cable?

  2. What is the expected latency at 10m compared to the standard 1.2m integrated cable?

  3. Has anyone here tested or validated the 10m ZED 2i cable for real-time applications such as visual servoing, SLAM, or closed-loop control?

  4. For those who have used third-party USB 3.0 extension cables (e.g., Newnex FireNEX-uLINK series) with ZED 2 or ZED 2i — how was your experience in terms of latency, bandwidth, and IMU data integrity?

Thank you in advance for any guidance or shared experience!