Looking at the range of focus of the Zed X Nano. Just wanted to pass along a “great work”. The optics, imager choice, IMU are so very well balanced.
X Nano has solved a difficult problem we have been struggling.
s/Bruce
Looking at the range of focus of the Zed X Nano. Just wanted to pass along a “great work”. The optics, imager choice, IMU are so very well balanced.
X Nano has solved a difficult problem we have been struggling.
s/Bruce
Hi @bruce42
Welcome to the Stereolabs community
Thank you very much for your kind words; they are really appreciated, and I will make sure they reach the whole engineering team that designed the ZED X Nano.
We are very happy to know that the camera helped you solve a problem you were struggling with.
Feel free to share your results on the forum when you can; the StereoLabs community would love to see what you are building with it.
Bruce’s point about the balance between optics, imager, and IMU is what stands out to me too. It is one thing to list specs, but getting those three to work in harmony at that size is the real engineering challenge. The range of focus detail is useful to hear firsthand. I would also be curious to see the results you mentioned, since real-world output says more than a datasheet. Thanks for sharing the specifics rather than just a general compliment.