# Isaac Sim extension on ARM64 **URL:** \ **Category:** Software\ **Created:** [October 20, 2026, 3:23pm UTC](https://community.stereolabs.com/t/isaac-sim-extension-on-arm64/11803 "2026-10-20T15:23:18Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![linarism](https://community.stereolabs.com/user_avatar/community.stereolabs.com/linarism/32/5076_2.png) [@linarism](https://community.stereolabs.com/u/linarism)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 3:23pm UTC](https://community.stereolabs.com/t/isaac-sim-extension-on-arm64/11803/1 "2026-10-20T15:23:18Z")
I’m trying to use [Stereolabs](https://www.stereolabs.com/)’ ZED Isaac Sim extension for ZED X Mini stereo cameras on an NVIDIA GB10 system, which is ARM64/SBSA. In the [v5.3.0 build script](https://github.com/stereolabs/zed-isaac-sim/blob/v5.3.0/build.sh), the native libraries are downloaded as Linux x86\_64 binaries, and the [extension configuration](https://github.com/stereolabs/zed-isaac-sim/blob/v5.3.0/exts/sl.sensor.camera/config/extension.toml) lists only x86\_64 package targets. Is an ARM64/SBSA build available or planned? My current target is Isaac Sim 6.2. I noticed v5.3.0 lists Isaac Sim 6.0.1 and 6.1 support; guidance on 6.2 compatibility would also help. ---
**Author:** ![Myzhar](https://community.stereolabs.com/user_avatar/community.stereolabs.com/myzhar/32/11_2.png) [@Myzhar](https://community.stereolabs.com/u/Myzhar)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 5:20pm UTC](https://community.stereolabs.com/t/isaac-sim-extension-on-arm64/11803/2 "2026-10-20T17:20:26Z")
Hi @linarism, thank you for your interest in the ZED Isaac Sim extension and the [ZED X Mini](https://www.stereolabs.com/store/products/zed-x-mini-stereo-camera). > [@linarism](#): > > Is an ARM64/SBSA build available or planned? An ARM64/SBSA build is not available. As you noticed, the [v5.3.0 extension configuration](https://github.com/stereolabs/zed-isaac-sim/blob/v5.3.0/exts/sl.sensor.camera/config/extension.toml) only targets `windows-x86_64` and `linux-x86_64`, and the native libraries are built for x86\_64 only. ARM64/SBSA support is not in our current roadmap, so for now the extension requires an x86\_64 workstation running Isaac Sim. > [@linarism](#): > > My current target is Isaac Sim 6.2. I noticed v5.3.0 lists Isaac Sim 6.0.1 and 6.1 support; guidance on 6.2 compatibility would also help. v5.3.0 is validated only with Isaac Sim 6.0.1 and 6.1 (Kit 110.1.2 and 110.3.0), which share the same plugin ABI. Isaac Sim 6.2 support is planned for one of the next releases of the extension. ---
**Author:** ![BenjaminV](https://community.stereolabs.com/user_avatar/community.stereolabs.com/benjaminv/32/3863_2.png) [@BenjaminV](https://community.stereolabs.com/u/BenjaminV)\ **Post date:** [October 21, 2026, 9:33am UTC](https://community.stereolabs.com/t/isaac-sim-extension-on-arm64/11803/3 "2026-10-21T09:33:04Z")
Hi, The support for Isaac sim 6.2.0 (kit 110.4) will be added in the next release of the extension. Most likely planned for the ZED SDK 5.6 release. ---
**Author:** ![linarism](https://community.stereolabs.com/user_avatar/community.stereolabs.com/linarism/32/5076_2.png) [@linarism](https://community.stereolabs.com/u/linarism)\ **Post date:** [October 22, 2026, 2:38pm UTC](https://community.stereolabs.com/t/isaac-sim-extension-on-arm64/11803/4 "2026-10-22T14:38:51Z")
Hi @Myzhar & @BenjaminV, That’s disappointing for us. A strong advantage for running Isaac Sim on ARM64 is clean portability of our Jetson compute containers for SITL simulation. Requiring x86\_64 machine for simulation with our systems will require HITL simulation and therefore limit scalability. Would you have any workarounds that can be considered? Seems like cuVSLAM with ZED calibration data is our best path forward. ---
**Author:** ![BenjaminV](https://community.stereolabs.com/user_avatar/community.stereolabs.com/benjaminv/32/3863_2.png) [@BenjaminV](https://community.stereolabs.com/u/BenjaminV)\ **Post date:** [October 22, 2026, 2:57pm UTC](https://community.stereolabs.com/t/isaac-sim-extension-on-arm64/11803/5 "2026-10-22T14:57:38Z")
I understand. I’ll try to look into it soon, I suspect adding the support would be quite straightforward. If that’s the case, we might add it in a future release.